Posted by Defamation Lawyers Perth on October 27, 2023

People need to be aware of their alternatives for resolving disagreements in the complex world of civil litigation. These procedures include conventional ones like mediations and non-traditional ones like court-based ones like civil trials. By understanding the specifics of each and effectively defending your interests, you can decide on the most effective and efficient line of action for settlement.

This blog discusses civil trials and mediation in-depth, focusing on civil litigation lawyers Perth, Western Australia who help you resolve civil disputes.

The Traditional Route of Civil Trials

The civil trials system is the one most commonly used by the best civil defamation lawyers in Perth to settle disputes. After hearing the facts and the parties’ arguments, the judge decides.

The Process

The plaintiff typically files a complaint at the beginning of a civil trial. The defendant responds, and both sides gather evidence. The trial will include witness testimony, the presentation of the evidence, and closing arguments. In the end, the judge then delivers a judgment.

Advantages of Civil Trials

Civil trials have the advantage of delivering clear, legally enforceable results. A judge’s ruling is legally binding on the involved parties. This indicates that the winning party typically has access to enforceable remedies to ensure the judgment’s verdicts are carried out. Trials are typically made public records, promoting accountability and openness in the legal system.

However, it’s important to keep in mind that civil trials have a significant number of disadvantages. The adversarial nature of the procedures could result in emotional and mental exhaustion for both parties. Additionally, litigation can be costly and time-consuming, as some trials can go on for years.

The Alternative Approach of Mediations

A mediator, an impartial third party, assists the opposing parties in settling. As such, another alternative conflict resolution used by top defamation solicitors in Perth includes mediation.

The Process

In general, a trial is more formal than mediation. Both parties communicate their points of view and work to reach an understanding with the mediator’s assistance. Instead of being an adversarial process, it is a collaborative one.

Advantages of Mediations

One of the biggest advantages of mediation is how affordable it is. They can be completed in days or weeks instead of a court trial’s potentially lengthy period, and they usually cost less than trials. Additionally, mediations are private proceedings, which could be preferable when dealing with sensitive topics. Additionally, the parties have more influence over the process and outcome, which promotes ownership and collaboration.

Despite these advantages, mediation might not always end in an agreement between all parties. Furthermore, a mediation agreement won’t be as legally binding as a court judgment unless the legal system formally recognizes it.

The Intricacies of Defamation Cases in Perth, WA

In the simplest terms, defamation is the publication of false information that harms a person’s reputation. In Perth, Western Australia, special legislation governs defamation proceedings.

Proving Defamation

A statement must meet several criteria to be considered defamatory in WA. It must be false and communicated to at least one person other than the plaintiff, damaging the person’s reputation in the community.

Common Defences in Defamation

Defamation cases in Perth, Western Australia, offer a variety of potential defences that people and organisations can employ to protect themselves against claims that they have spread false and damaging information. Anyone involved in defamation must be aware of these common defences.


The truth is a powerful defence against defamation claims. It is a valid defence if the alleged statement can be proven true and factually accurate. In these circumstances, the defendant could assert they were merely telling the truth, an uncontested defence against defamation charges.


Another defence frequently used in defamation cases is having a genuine opinion. Unlike a statement of fact, expressing an opinion is normally protected as free speech. However, the claim must be expressed as an opinion rather than a statement of fact. Courts typically distinguish between statements of fact and expressions of personal opinion.

Qualified Privilege

Qualified privilege is a defence that can be utilised when a statement is made under specific circumstances, such as in particular professional or legal situations. For instance, qualified privilege can protect statements made in public or during court proceedings. The person would not be held liable for defamation if they acted within the bounds of their position or responsibility.

Choosing Between Trial and Mediation in Defamation Cases

The decision between a trial and mediation in a defamation case can significantly affect all parties’ outcomes and experience.


Selecting mediation in a defamation case allows for a more compassionate and non-adversarial approach. Mediators, who are unbiased third parties, assist the parties in communicating so that a solution acceptable to both parties can be reached.

This tactic can be especially beneficial when the defamation case involves personal relationships since it allows parties to discuss the issues privately and could help mend relations and reach an agreement. Mediation generally takes less time and costs less than going for a trial.


On the other hand, opting for a trial in a defamation case offers the opportunity to defend one’s reputation in front of the general public and seek compensation for the harm they have endured. Witnesses, information, and legal arguments are presented before the judge decides. Trials can produce decisive rulings and legally binding remedies, but they can also be emotionally and financially draining due to the lengthy processes involved.

End Remarks

If you are filing a defamation case or are the target of one, you must understand the benefits and limitations of civil trials and mediations. Trials offer a clear and frequent definitive outcome but are also stressful and expensive. However, mediation does not have the same level of certainty as a trial and instead offers a quicker, more adaptable, and more private resolution. In Perth, Western Australia, where defamation laws are particularly complex, having an expert on your side is essential. In this case, defamation lawyers in WA can assist.

They ensure that your interests are always protected by providing the guidance, support, and information you need to navigate the complex world of defamation law effectively.